Cate vs MonoCode

Compare 45 filters with recorded values on both sides. 3 of those values differ. How we select pairs.

Open any value for its finding, source, scope and check date.
Open any value for its source Cate MonoCode Add an ADE to this comparisonEmpty column
ScreenshotCate product interfaceMonoCode product interface
Where you work
Mac app YesYes
Windows app YesYes
Linux app YesYes
Browser NoNo
Native iOS YesYes
Native Android NoYes
Phone browser NoNo
Command line YesYes
Agents
Claude Code YesYes
Codex YesYes
Cursor Agent YesYes
Gemini CLI NoNo
OpenCode YesYes
Pi YesYes
Grok YesYes
Aider NoNo
Antigravity NoYes
Uses my subscription YesYes
Where it runs
On your computer YesYes
On your own server YesYes
In the vendor's cloud NoNo
Keeps going with laptop closed YesYes
How it works
Worktree per task YesYes
Containers NoNo
VM or microVM NoNo
Parallel agents YesYes
Coordinator agent YesYes
Built-in issues NoNo
Scheduled runs NoYes
Team and shipping
Team sessions YesNot listed
Team roles NoNo
SSO NoNo
Pull requests YesYes
Review screen YesYes
Ownership
Product license MITMIT
Self-hosting YesYes
Telemetry opt-out NoNo
Price
Has a free plan YesYes
Pricing model Entirely free, bring your own keyEntirely free
Paid plans from Not listedNot listed
Status
Lifecycle status Not listedNot listed
Measured by ADEMark Third-party, 15 ADEs, to 12 November 2026 · ademark.dev, CC BY 4.0 · How to read places
Cold start Not benchmarked1.8 s · 2nd of 12
New thread, ready to type Not benchmarked191 ms · 2nd of 10
First word on screen Not benchmarked779 ms · 6th of 11
Typing lag, 5 agents streaming Not benchmarked62 ms · 6th of 11
Open a 2,000-message thread Not benchmarked94 ms · 5th of 11
Memory at rest, 5 threads Not benchmarked419 MB · 2nd of 12
Idle CPU Not benchmarked9.03% · 12th of 13
Memory under load Not benchmarked1.5 GB · 2nd of 10
Tokens to answer “hi” Not benchmarked44.6K tokens · 9th of 13
Tokens for one real question Not benchmarked122.4K tokens · 6th of 13
Team build: hidden tests passed Not benchmarkedNot measured